And this is the why...
I'm going to be an obnoxious
twenty one year old and cry out from my petite pedestal that I dislike a
term/lifestyle: co-parenting.
I'd never heard of this term before I discovered this blog, which
is a blog by a lady by the name of J., who--along with her husband--runs an
organization/ministry.
I've read quite a few of J's posts, and I agree that she has some
good ideas, and many interesting points. She’s an intelligent writer. However,
this particular post irked me. J and her husband "co-parent", a term
which confused me, at first—but supposedly-- is the idea that both parents
equally parent the child.
So, the kiddos get equal mommy and daddy time. Time to be nurtured
and loved from Mommy and nurtured (in
the masculine sense) and loved from Daddy?
Yay! Right?
What co-parenting does is insist that both parents
have equal diaper, feeding, reading, teaching, disciplining time with the child
and equal working out, working, recreation, and hobby time for
themselves.
Like any kid who's tried to split a Snickers bar perfectly in half
knows, 50/50 rarely works out, even if both sides sincerely try.
Last week was metaphor and simile week in poetry class. ;)
J and her husband both have their careers, and they both want to
devote ample and equal time to their respective careers. It seems reasonable
enough.
But, it was when J penned [fine, typed] these words that my I cannot stand this idea and
this woman makes me want to slap her radar
began blaring. "I notice the pattern, that I write when
[child] sleeps, and that[ husband] writes while I watch [child]."
Watch.
Take.
Care for.
These words, when written in
the tone she writes them in, do not denote a mother, comforting,
loving, and adoring the moments spend with her child, but an underpaid
babysitter grumbling about overtime she's required to put in watching a child,
albeit a beloved child.
If you doubt me, or think I'm being
histrionic, I heartily encourage you to read the blog post (linked
above).
J seems to think that parenting is a
shift, clocking in an out, passing notes off to the relief. Co-parenting is
great, she thinks, until your shift goes into overtime, or when your co-worker
gets sick, or when you don't get to [whatever].
The theme of J's post is Mercy. And one of the things
she needs to be merciful in, is her husband just spending too much time on his
work, his hobbies, errands, and not spending his share of time with their son
so she can attend to her other very
important duties.
After all, hubby not taking his due
time with the child is definitely reason to be bitter
and resentful. Having to write when the child is asleep, instead of husband
doing his time watching him is really, really incorrigible.
Susie, you don't have kids..sooo...
No, not yet. I've only been married
for 3 months, so if I had a baby right now, that'd be awkward to explain to the
family. However, I do have two awesome real-life anecdotes of
parents
who parent, tag teaming through the joys,
vomit, tears, and giggles of raising children.
And one from…well, you’ll see…
The first is the beautiful,
delightful couple whose darling, adorable, twin two year old munchkins I
babysit once a week. Both of them have their careers, and they both are
striving to be the best parents they can be to their [seriously I adore them]
precious children. Daddy is in the military and Mommy is in the reserve and is
getting her master's, along with working. The cuties spend some time in day
care (no comment about that) but lots and lots of time with mommy or daddy, and
of course, mommy AND daddy. They also spend one afternoon a week (sometimes
more) with their loud, vivacious, and exciting babysitter, Miss Susie ;).
They love, adore, admire BOTH their parents, although Daddy is sometimes
the "cooler parent" because he gives them candy. Their favorite time
of day is when they get both parents.
And their parents love them, spending
time with them, reading to them and encouraging those fresh little minds, and
raising them up to be beautiful girls. They love their careers too, but their
children, rather, their family, is at the forefront of their lives.
Their spirits, demeanor, and the very
way they fall to their knees and open up their arms to embrace their squealing
children show that they joyfully parent their babies. It's not "I spent more time with them
this week, so next week you better up the ante" but "I work so I can
provide for my beautiful children and rush home to spend time with them and
you, my love". They are
truly the most beautiful family. J's "I watch [my child]" bitterness
looks vapid, absurd, and selfish next to this shining example of marriage and
parenting.
The second...
She's going to write about her
parents again..
Yes, yes, I am.
Daddy was a hard-working,
dreamin' entrepreneur, who started a few businesses, and loved his savior,
his family, and the party of Reagan. Mama was (and still is) an educated women,
who LOVED and rejoiced in being a stay at home mom,who homeschooled her eight
kids, worked alongside her husband in his various businesses, and kept the home
front sane and running.
Ask any of us older kids about our
childhood memories when Daddy was alive and you'll hear...
Daddy took us here...
Mama taught us this...
We burned
down this played this game...
Both my parents were actively involved in my religious, mental,
physical, and education upbringing and development, and ergo, both were
thoroughly involved in my life.
And the
surprise…
In the hit t.v. series, That
Seventies Show, the bumbling idiot of the show, Kelso, has a baby with a
girl named Brook. Brook is an intelligent, beautiful, loving woman, brimming
with maternal instinct and baby book knowledge. However, she can't seem to
figure out the art of cloth diaper pinning. Brook, in one episode, bursts into
tears, convinced there's no way her child will survive because its mother can't
figure out how to diaper it.
Kelso, however, is a master at
diaper-pinning.
Brook and Kelso realize they both
have strengths and abilities to bring into their child's life, and if they BOTH
are involved, the wee one might have a chance.
But it doesn't have to be 50/50. Split down the middle. 12 hours on, 12 off.
But it doesn't have to be 50/50. Split down the middle. 12 hours on, 12 off.
From what I've observed and learned,
good parenting is a natural patch-work of the parents tag-teaming, and using
their own gifts to help grow the child.
Co-parenting? Co-parenting sounds like regimented babysitting
shifts.
And for Stephen and I and our
children?
Well, having changed hundreds of
diapers (big and small), compared to Stephen's, ahem, zero, I win the diaper
wars. ;) Being the bubbly, energetic, people-lover--with a well-developed
nurturing muscle--that I am, I'll probably do most the child
"watching" (to quote J). However, I am so excited that my
brilliant, analytic, godly, and geeky husband is going to contribute to
our children's daily routines, experiences, and probably, tastes. So much Star Wars...
So I guess we'll be co-parenting,
just dropping the "co" and keeping the "parenting" and the
many trials, joys, and crazy moments that word means. No time clocks
needed!
I want to mother like H. from Carrots for Michelmas, who uses her brilliance to write, relies on God to be a grace-filled mother, and positively adores her husband.
Note: this blog post is about how I don't agree with the idea or practice of co-parenting. However, I think that J., even with her differing mindset, is trying to have a healthful attitude about the issue (see end of her blog). It's just that co-parenting, in and of itself, seems to be founded off of selfishness. Each conscience is different, and for mine, the practice of co-parenting would be a selfish one, and consequently, a wrong one.
I want to mother like H. from Carrots for Michelmas, who uses her brilliance to write, relies on God to be a grace-filled mother, and positively adores her husband.
Note: this blog post is about how I don't agree with the idea or practice of co-parenting. However, I think that J., even with her differing mindset, is trying to have a healthful attitude about the issue (see end of her blog). It's just that co-parenting, in and of itself, seems to be founded off of selfishness. Each conscience is different, and for mine, the practice of co-parenting would be a selfish one, and consequently, a wrong one.
Motherhood is a great honor and
privilege, yet it is also synonymous with servanthood. Every day woman are
called upon to selflessly meet the needs of their families. Whether they are awake at night nursing a baby, spending their time and money on less-than-grateful-teenagers, or preparing meals, mothers constantly put others before themselves. --Charles Stanley
No comments:
Post a Comment